Search for: "Will Co., Ltd"
Results 1 - 20
of 9,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 8:01 pm
Ceric Oxide Author Walkerma Reproduced with kind permission of the copyright owner Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Lewison, Floyd and Jackson) Anan Kasei Co Ltd and another v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Ltd and another [2019] WLR(D) 553, [2019] EWCA Civ 1646 Patents Court (Roger Wyand QC) Anan Kasei Co. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:20 am
Ltd. v Sky UK Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 2376 (Ch) This was a claim by the famous consumer electronics and video games company, Nintendo Company Limited, for an order requiring Sky UK Ltd [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
Lupin Ltd. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:30 am
Wasa International Insurance Co Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co; AGF Insurance Ltd v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 150; WLR (D) 69 “Where the wording in a contract of reinsurance was the same as or equivalent to that in the underlying contract of insurance, the two contracts should be given the same construction unless there were clear indications to the contrary. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:08 am
Prudential Assurance Co. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:51 am
Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 726; [2012] WLR (D) 169 “The principles established in Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 were not applicable to a case in which the former employer of a patent attorney now employed within a competitor organisation sought injunctive relief to restrain the current employer from acting by, or otherwise seeking assistance or advice from, the patent attorney in… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:21 am
Progress Property Co Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd [2010] UKSC 55; [2010] WLR (D) 218 “The sale of a company’s assets to a shareholder was not an unlawful distribution of assets if the court concluded that it was a genuine commercial transaction at arm’s length even if it appeared with hindsight that the sale was at an undervalue. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Canwell Estate Co Ltd v Smith Brothers Farms Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 237; [2012] WLR (D) 59 “The prohibition introduced by the Rentcharges Act 1977 against creation of new rentcharges by a rent owner against a landowner did not apply to the creation of a rentcharge incorporated in a transfer made in 1990 the amount of which was calculated annually as a fixed proportion of the claimant’s costs, expenses and outgoings incurred in fulfilling its obligations under a… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:14 am
In re Employers’ Liability “Trigger” Litigation; Durham v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Freming & Eddlestone v Independent Insurance Co Ltd; Edwards v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Thomas Bates & Son Ltd v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Akzo; Nobel UK Ltd and another v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Co and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1096; [2010] WLR (D)… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
The Bridgewater Canal Co Ltd v GEO Networks Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1348; [2010] WLR (D) 306 “On the proper construction of the Electronic Communications Code, set out in Sch 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1984 as amended by the Communications Act 2003, the special regime which applied to linear obstacles differed not only from the general regime but also from the other special regimes for which the code provided. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:42 am
Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Co Ltd [2010] EWHC 2026 (Comm); [2010] WLR (D) 230 “An arbitral tribunal in assessing damages for breach of contract had been wrong to treat a claim for wasted expenses and a claim for loss of profits as two separate and independent claims which could not be ‘mixed’. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:01 am
Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 726; [2012] WLR (D) 169 “The principles established in Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 were not applicable to a case in which the former employer of a patent attorney now employed within a competitor organisation sought injunctive relief to restrain the current employer from acting by, or otherwise seeking assistance or advice from, the patent attorney in… [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:51 am
Poets Chase Freehold Co. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:07 am
Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd; [2009] WLR (D) 72 “Where the landlord's consent was required to an assignment of a lease, the landlord could not reasonably impose a condition which was designed to increase the rights he enjoyed under the headlease. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
Wasa International Insurance Co Ltd v Lexington Insurance Co; AGF Insurance Ltd v Same Court of Appeal “The English court would construe contracts of insurance and reinsurance to give effect to the intention of the parties to cover environmental damage, unless there were clear indications to the contrary. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 7:00 am
Ltd’s Improper and Unreasonable Litigation Tactics Game and Technology Co. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:05 am
Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and another; Topping v Bench Town Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F T Everard & Sons Ltd and another [2007] UKHL 39 “A person who developed pleural plaques as a result of having been negligently exposed to asbestos in the course of his employment, could not sue his employers for negligence because the presence of pleural… [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:22 am
Pleural plaques provide no cause of action Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd and Another; Topping v Benchtown Ltd (formerly Jones Bros Preston Ltd); Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd; Grieves v F. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:42 am
Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd Court of Appeal “Where the head landlord's consent was required to an assignment of a lease, he could not reasonably impose a condition which was designed to increase the rights he enjoyed under the headlease. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:44 am
International Leisure Ltd and another v First National Trustee Co UK Ltd and others: [2012] EWHC 1971 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 208 “The rule against reflective loss and the extent to which a shareholder could sue for loss primarily suffered by and primarily belonging to a company did not extend to loss suffered by holders of a debenture.” WLR Daily, 16th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
